MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3152552866 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.677

A control oriented pattern for plant design: the homogeneous population pattern

2020· article· en· W3152552866 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtremum Seeking Control Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomogeneousSimple (philosophy)Controller (irrigation)PopulationControl (management)Computer scienceControl engineeringControl theory (sociology)Class (philosophy)Mathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider an adaptive control problem for a homogeneous population of systems that operate in close conditions. Drawing a connection to Design of Experiments (DoE), we study an extremum seeking controller that operates the population economically by either minimizing a group cost or maximizing a group utility. The controller is formalized in full detail within a dynamic setting that extends the previous treatment. The applicability and effectiveness of the strategy is commented upon and supported through different examples. We argue that this class of control systems should be addressed as a design pattern where possible in view of its capacity to enable both simple and effective online optimizing control strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it