Statistical and Machine Learning-Based Recognition of Coughing Events Using Triaxial Accelerometer Sensor Data From Multiple Wearable Points
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies have investigated the use of the accelerometer sensors in smartphones and wearable devices for human activity recognition such as sitting, standing, walking, and laying down with reasonably high accuracy. In this letter, we use a triaxial microelectromechanical accelerometer that is commonly used in smartphones to detect and discern coughing events. Our letter focuses on detecting and differentiating coughing from other human activities such as sitting, standing, and walking using accelerometer's x, y, and z data from various body positions where electronics such as smartphones, watches, headphones, and earphones are commonly worn. Our research compares acceleration measured at five different positions on the body: chest, stomach, shirt-pocket, upper arm, and ear. The measurements are analyzed in the x, y, and z directions using the statistical and machine learning (ML) approaches to study how well coughing activity can be differentiated from acceleration due to other human motions. Analysis of the measured data using both methods show accelerometers mounted on the ear/headphones to be the ideal spot to detect and differentiate coughing with the highest accuracy. ML analysis of accelerometer measurements on ear and chest shows 96 and 93% accuracy, respectively, for cough detection. Measurements show the standard deviation and convolution neural network detection accuracy for cough detection in the ear to be 15 and 3% more sensitive compared to the next best position, which is chest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".