Pengaruh Dana Alokasi Umum, Dana Alokasi Khusus dan Pendapatan Asli Daerah Terhadap Belanja Daerah Pada Kabupaten Padang Pariaman 2010-2017
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this\nstudy is to examine the effect of general allocation funds, special allocation\nfunds and Original\nLocal Government Revenues on regional expenditure in the Padang Pariaman\nDistrict Government in West Sumatra Province in the first quarter of 2010 - IV\nquarter 2017. The object of this research is the Padang Pariaman District\nGovernment. The data used is secondary data taken from the report on the\nrealization of the regional revenue and expenditure budget of Padang Pariaman\nRegency obtained from the Regional Financial Management Agency (BPKD). The results of the study\nshow that the Special Allocation Funds and Original Local Government Revenues have a significant effect on regional expenditure, while\nthe General Allocation Funds does not have a significant effect on the Regional\nExpenditure of the Government of Padang Pariaman Regency, West Sumatra Province
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".