A fuzzy inference method for image fusion/refinement of CT images from incomplete data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
knowledge inherent in the membership functions and the logical rules of a fuzzy inference system (FIS) to compensate for the missing data. It is shown that a fuzzy inference system can be used to improve the quality of reconstructed CT images, particularly when the images are reconstructed from incomplete data. It is proposed to reconstruct a coarser image for which the data is over-complete, and use the histograms of this image and that of the original finer image to generate the membership functions required in FIS. The two images are then fused, with the aid of logical rules based on the knowledge that the two images posses the same distinct attributes (pixel values). In order to avoid the difference in spatial resolution between the original fine image and the reconstructed coarse image, a modified FIS method is introduced to refine the fine image. Results are presented, showing visually and quantitatively that this FIS refinement process improves the quality of the original fine image.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it