MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3152885598 · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.002

Tool development to improve medication information transfer to patients during transitions of care: A participatory action research and design thinking methodology approach

2021· article· en· W3152885598 on OpenAlexafffund
Shoshana Hahn‐Goldberg, Audrey Chaput, Zahava R. S. Rosenberg-Yunger, Yona Lunsky, Karen Okrainec, Sara J. T. Guilcher, Michelle Ransom, Lisa McCarthy

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthCanadian Pharmacists AssociationWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsParticipatory action researchCitizen journalismParticipatory designAction (physics)Action researchProcess managementKnowledge managementManagement scienceComputer scienceMedicinePsychologySociologyEngineeringMathematics educationOperations managementWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Medication changes during transitions of care is a recognized challenge that has been linked to adverse events. The delivery of medication instructions during transition from hospital to home is a priority area for improvement. OBJECTIVE: The goals of this work were to 1) understand the current experiences of patients and families; and 2) co-design tools to improve medication information transfer during transitions of care together with patients, families, and providers. METHODS: A participatory action approach, using mixed methods within a design thinking framework was used. Participants were chosen from patient groups at higher risk of adverse events, guided by extreme user design, which posits that needs of extreme users can also fit the majority. Providers, patients and family (users) were interviewed to understand current experiences with medication information transfer during transitions of care and to solicit input on potential elements to inform tool design. Users were engaged in iterative creation of prototypes. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients, family caregivers, and providers were engaged throughout this project. Findings highlighted challenges currently experienced, strengthening the case for tools that engage the patient and family in medication information transfer. Important information included why medications were prescribed, how to take them, side effects, and an explanation of the role of community pharmacists. Displaying information in a grid format was preferred. Two tools were prototyped: (1) A Medication Whiteboard for engaging patients and families in creating their medication routine, and (2) A Patient Oriented Medication List for providing medication instructions and as a reference once patients are home. CONCLUSIONS: Through the use of mixed methods within a design thinking framework, the team was able to understand the challenges and design prototypes of tools that both engage patients and families in developing their medication routine and improve medication information transfer during transitions of care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.806
GPT teacher head0.621
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in Social and Administrative PharmacySame topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrench-language works237,207