MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3152886293

An Interview With Professor Dilip M Nachane

2020· article· en· W3152886293 on OpenAlex
Grk Murty

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Development in India
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchools of economic thoughtManagementSociologyPolitical scienceEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inspired by the Strumilin-Mahalanobis model of planning being implemented by the young independent India for laying a strong foundation for its economic growth, a young graduate who had just then passed BA Mathematics, securing first rank with distinction from Bombay University in 1965, in an unusual move decided to pursue another BA degree, this time in Economics as elective, hoping that with his knowledge of Mathematics and Statistics allied with economic theory, he could contribute his mite to the then ongoing India’s planning exercise and its overall economic welfare. After completing BA with Economics, he joined MA Economics at Bombay University and passed in 1968 with first rank. He obtained his PhD in 1973. That young scholar is none other than Dilip Madhukar Nachane, who in 1971 joining his alma mater as a lecturer, became a reader, then UGC Chair in Modern Quantitative Economics in 1978, before finally becoming the Director of the Department of Economics at Mumbai University in 1993. In 2003, Prof. Nachane joined the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR) as a Senior Professor, and later in 2007-10, he served as its Director-cum-Vice Chancellor. Since 2010, he has been working as Professor Emeritus at IGIDR. In 2011, he was also appointed the Chancellor of Central University of Manipur. When Prof. Nachane started teaching Mathematical Economics to the first batch of students in 1977-79, there was no tradition of teaching the subject with any of the expected rigor; nor were there any textbooks available like today. According to Romar Correa, the first batch student, their background in Mathematics education was limited to high-school algebra and geometry. Correa says that yet “Prof. Nachane rising to the occasion gamely”, skirting the likely pitfalls of either the sophistication dictated by the reading list that would have been completely incomprehensible to the students, or without trivializing math with chitchat substituting for proofs, “pitched his teaching high but not inaccessible to the outstretched hands”. Correa, Prof. Nachane’s doctoral student, who later became RBI Chair Professor of Monetary Economics, University of Mumbai, further states that Prof. Nachane “is a renaissance man. The history of economics and economic history, literature and philosophy, are part of his makeup and come to the fore in interactions.” No surprise, he was conferred with the UGC Swami Pranavananda Saraswathi National Award in 2004 for his lifelong contribution to the teaching of economics in India. Besides teaching economics for over five-and-a-half decades, Prof. Nachane also guided 40 scholars for PhD in several facets of economics. He has also carried out research into core econometrics, improving the testing tools for causal relationships, computational methods for TVP problems, etc. He has made significant contributions to several areas in economics by publishing more than 100 papers. He has also carried out extensive research in post-liberalization growth in India, impact of reforms on banks’ credit behavior and capital adequacy requirements, etc. It is in recognition of his outstanding contributions to econometric studies in India that he was elected President of the Indian Econometric Society in 2003. For Prof. Nachane, Monetary Economics remained his main research area for almost five decades. He did extensive research in the areas of monetary policy, its transmission to real economy, inflation estimation, exchange rate regimes, business cycles, international trade and balance of payments, etc. During 2005-11, he also served as a member of the Technical Advisory Committee on Monetary Policy of the Reserve Bank of India. His youthful ambition to work for the welfare of the Indian economy appeared to have been fulfilled when he was appointed Member of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council in 2013. He has recently been included in the International Biographical Center (Cambridge, UK) list of 2000 “Outstanding Intellectuals of the 21st Century.” He was a Visiting Professor at University of British Columbia, Canada (1988-89), University of Manchester, UK (1990), University of Ulster, UK (1991), University of Avigon, France (1997) and Otto von Guericke University, Germany (2002-2004). Once, I heard a Professor describing Monetary Economics as something akin to that of Uankara’s Advaita Vedânta, which apparently sounds simple but profoundly complex to comprehend as an integral whole. There is a certain mysticism encircling it, yet, at the hands of Prof. Nachane, you find monetary issues turning so obvious as he so lucidly articulates his way forward through the maze of issues raised in this interview. He simply makes everything look so very clear to every reader, for he speaks as a teacher but not as an economist. That is his depth of knowledge and his commitment as a teacher to make complex concepts obvious to students, and that is what you will enjoy in the following pages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it