There’s Just No Place for a Street Fighting Man!: Understanding the Influences of Race, Gender and Sexual Orientation in Britain’s Counterculture Between 1964-1971
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the 1960s, young Britons began to challenge the restrictive social norms, roles and responsibilities that governed their culture and asserted their voices to promote individual expression and freedom. At the core of this youth rebellion were the Rolling Stones. Within their music, performance, appearance and fashion, the Stones epitomized the anti-establishment attitudes harboured by Britain’s young people and made the cultural shifts that were taking place in the country tangible. In this research paper, I will investigate how Blackness, sexual orientation and gender identification challenged and reshaped the Rolling Stones’s message of rebellion, nonconformity and decadence. By reviewing a diverse range of archival footage, including the Stones’s performances on Ready Steady Go!, Jean-Luc Godard’s short film One-Plus-One and The Stones in the Park, as well as contemporary literary sources, music periodicals, Parliamentary legislation and British feminist, queer and Black Panther activism, I will evaluate the complicated, and often obscurantist, ways in which Britain’s youth rebellion fortified the subordination of traditionally marginalized communities while simultaneously making racial, queer and gender-based injustice visible to the British public. In sum, by placing the Stones’ racial, gendered and queer imagination within a complex political culture, I believe that my research will provide a unique perspective to the complexities and nuances of the social upheaval that occurred in Britain during the 1960s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".