MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3153098349 · doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.279

Outsourcing Methods for Optimizing the Staff Management of the Economical Organizations

2022· article· en· W3153098349 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alfia M. Kireeva-Karimova, Anh. Nguyen Hai, S.M. Nuriyahmetova

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Criminology and Sociology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKazan Federal University
KeywordsOutsourcingKnowledge process outsourcingBusinessCore competencyProcess managementCore (optical fiber)Control (management)Resistance (ecology)Business administrationKnowledge managementIndustrial organizationOperations managementMarketingManagementComputer scienceEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main aim of the study is to investigate the components of the concept of outsourcing, the genesis of its development, analyzes the transformation of outsourcing of information technology systems, defined the place of outsourcing in the practice of Russian and international business. It has given an assessment for the problems of implementation, outsourcing under conditions of uncertainty, types and tools of outsourcing are analyzed, aspects of optimizing the control of production costs at the core of the business, core competencies, non-core assets and types of economical business organizations are analyzed, the problem of overcoming staff resistance to changes during the implementation of the outsourcing program is analyzed, and prospects for implementation of HR-outsourcing are identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Criminology and SociologySame topicEngineering and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207