MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EVOLUTION OF TRANSIT TIME BETWEEN THE SYSTOLIC AND DIASTOLIC PRESSURE PEAKS OF THE RADIAL PULSE WAVEFORM AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

2021· article· en· W3153122092 on OpenAlexaff
Émy Philibert, Hasan Obeid, Mathilde Paré, Nadège Côté, Catherine Fortier, Rémi Goupil, Mohsen Agharazii

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalUniversité LavalHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePulse wave velocityArterial stiffnessRadial arteryCardiologyBlood pressurePulse pressureInternal medicineDiastoleApplanation tonometryWaveformArteryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The transit time between peak systolic and peak diastolic digital volume pulse had been proposed as a measure of arterial stiffness. Indeed, the height of an individual divided by such transit time can be used to estimate a pulse wave velocity. In a cohort of patients with end-stage kidney disease, we aim to examine whether the reduction of aortic stiffness that occurs after kidney transplantation (KTx), translates into improvement of radial artery systolic-diastolic pulse transit time. Design and method: Before and three months after KTx, we recorded radial pressure waveforms using applanation tonometry in 62 patients. We used a two gaussian method to break down the radial pressure waveforms to extract transit time. Radial waveforms were recorded over a 10 seconds period and ensemble-averaged (using in house-MATLAB program) to obtain a single waveform and then modelled using two Gaussian functions. Transit time (dT) was determined as the difference between the first systolic peak (T1) and the early diastolic peak (T2). Generalized transfer function was used to estimate central blood pressures. Carotid-radial and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocities (cr-PWV, cf-PWV) were also measured. Results: 62 patients (66% male, mean age: 48 ± 14 years, mean eGFR: 66 ± 17 ml/min/1.73m2) were assessed. After KTx, there was a significant reduction in cr-PWV (9.49 ± 1.50 to 8.94 ± 1.34, p = 0.001) and cf-PWV (11.56 ± 2.65 to 10.19 ± 1.72, p < 0.001), as well as in central and peripheral blood pressure (p < 0.001). While T1 significantly declined (0.184 [0.172–0.199] to 0.179 [0.164–0.194]s, p = 0.008), there were no significant changes in transit time (0.139 [0.119–0.165] to 0.134 [0.118–0.178]s, p = 0.390) nor in T2 (0.325 [0.293–0.361] to 0.319 [0.283–0.357]s, p = 0.119). Conclusions: Contrary to our expectation, three months after KTx, we did not observe a significant change in transit time. Our results suggest that transit time between the systolic and diastolic pressure peaks of the radial pulse waveform may not be used as a marker of arterial stiffness. We propose that the radial artery pressure wave integrates information from both upstream and downstream vascular beds and so the transit time cannot be used as a reliable surrogate for arterial stiffness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HypertensionSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207