Preliminary Validation of the Sleep and Concussion Questionnaire as an Outcome Measure for Sleep Following Brain Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sleep and wakefulness disturbances are common with traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, there are no condition-specific measures to evaluate sleep following TBI. OBJECTIVE: To assess the convergent validity of the Sleep and Concussion Questionnaire (SCQ), a condition-specific (TBI) measure is compared to polysomnography and existing self-report sleep questionnaires. PARTICIPANTS INCLUDED: Thirty-two adults diagnosed with mild TBI, 3-24 months post-injury, average age, 38.9 years, predominantly female (63%) and with symptoms of chronic insomnia. METHODS: Participants underwent polysomnographic evaluation of sleep and completed the SCQ, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Correlations were assessed using Pearson's correlations. The sample was sufficiently powered (0.85) to detect a moderate to strong correlation of 0.5 or greater. RESULTS: SCQ sub-questions were meaningfully correlated with corresponding objective sleep parameters (time awake, number of awakenings, sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset) as measured with polysomnography. Additional significant correlations were seen between total scores on the SCQ and ISI and between SCQ sub questions and total ESS scores. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides initial evidence of the convergent validity of the SCQ with objective sleep parameters and existing self-report measures in patients after mild TBI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".