MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3153314201 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.10701

21. Making the World a Colourful Place: Exploration of the Key Condensation Enzymes in the Biosynthesis of Prodiginines and Tambjamines

2018· article· en· W3153314201 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Katherine J. Picott

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiosynthesisMoleculeEnzymeBacteriaCombinatorial chemistryChemistrySubstrate (aquarium)StereochemistryBiochemistryBiologyOrganic chemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacteria produce many natural products that have useful bioactivities such as antibiotic, anticancer and antifungal effects. In bacteria, these molecules are made in a step-by-step process using proteins called enzymes that assist in building the molecule at each step of the process. This research is focusing on the biosynthesis of two classes of natural products called prodiginines and tambjamines. The molecules in each class have different structures but follow similar construction steps. Both processes first form the same common intermediate, then in the final step this intermediate is combined with another unique intermediate to make the final product. In this study, the enzyme that is involved in the final step of the process will be characterized for both prodiginine and tambjamine-type molecules. By purifying the enzymes for both types of molecule properties such as their catalytic mechanism, substrate flexibility, and structure can be determined and compared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicMicrobial Metabolism and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207