MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3153473384 · doi:10.4103/1319-4534.310403

Ocularists the less known mid eye care professionals and their contribution in eye health care

2020· article· en· W3153473384 on OpenAlexaff
Nusrat Changal, Waleed AlRasheed, Rajiv Khandekar

Bibliographic record

VenueSaudi Journal of Ophthalmology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Trauma and Fracture Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEye careBlindingOcular prosthesisGlobeOptometryHealth careNursingOphthalmologySurgeryProsthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ocularists are ophthalmic technicians usually working at oculoplastics departments in tertiary eye hospitals. They prepare, provide, fit and maintain ocular or orbital prosthesis. Improving the esthetics of eye and face improves the patient's personality, self-confidence, self-esteem, and health-related quality of life. Hence, their contribution as team-member of the oculoplasty department is significant. Ocularists work with patients with congenital anomalies of the orbit/eye and individuals who have undergone removal of the globe due to trauma, tumor, or painful blinding disease. This brief communication will outline some of their job responsibilities, interaction with patients, scope of duties, and providing modern eye care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSaudi Journal of OphthalmologySame topicFacial Trauma and Fracture ManagementFrench-language works237,207