MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CONTROL OF HYPERTENSION BY ETHNICS IN COLOMBIA, A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF COLOMBIA PURE STUDY

2021· article· en· W3153476793 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Alejandra Parra-Gómez, Paul Anthony Camacho, José López-López, Grecia Gallo-Marín, Sumathy Rangarajan, Salim Yusuf, Patricio López‐Jaramillo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Health and Social Inequalities
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDescendantMedicineEthnic groupEpidemiologyDemographyPopulationProspective cohort studyInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective: Hypertension is the main cardiovascular risk factor and its prevalence varies among the countries according to their economic income and ethnicity. Colombia is a middle-high income country, with a variety of ethnic groups among the national territory. We aim to describe the prevalence and control of hypertension by ethnics in Colombia and its associated factors. Design and method: Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study - Colombia is a prospective, population-based cohort study on persons aged 35–70 years. Ethnic group was assessed by phenotypic characters (skin, eyes and hair color) and self-definition of white, mestizo (mixture of white and indigenous) and afro-descendant. Descriptive and analytic analysis was performed, using STATA V.11. Results: 4457 individuals were included, of those 73.5% (N = 3275) where mestizos, 14.1% (N = 626) white and 12% (N = 535) afro-descendant. The prevalence of hypertension was, (34.9%; CI 33.2–36.5) in mestizos, (37.3%; IC 33.5–41.1) in whites, and (43.5%; CI 39.3–47.7) in afro-descendant. The afro-descendant have the lower percentage of awareness (43.5%; CI 37.3–50.0) compared with (51.5%; CI 48.6–54.4) in mestizos and (52.3%; CI 45.9–58.7) in whites. The percentage of treatment was lower (43.1%; IC 36.9–49.6) in the afro-descendant in relation to (45.2%; CI 42.3–48.1) in mestizos and (47.2%; CI 40.8–53.6) in whites, but only (13.8%; CI 9.9–18.8) of afro-descendant have hypertension controlled in relation to (18%; CI 13.5–23.5) in whites and (17.9%; CI 15.7–20.2) in mestizos. On the univariate analysis we found that being afro-descendant is a risk factor to hypertension against being white 1.30 (CI 1.02–1.64). In the multivariate analysis it was maintained after adjustment by age, education level, socio-economic income, urban/rural and muscle strength 1.57 (IC 1.20–2.06). Conclusions: Afro-descendants have a higher risk of hypertension in Colombia. Moreover, the percentage of awareness, treatment and control of hypertension are lower in this ethnic group. The association with socio-economic or genetic factors remains to be determinate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HypertensionSame topicPublic Health and Social InequalitiesFrench-language works237,207