MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3153485348 · doi:10.52386/neurona.v37i2.120

EFEKTIVITAS DONEPEZIL TERHADAP FUNGSI KOGNITIF PASIEN TUMOR INTRAKRANIAL PASCAOPERASI

2020· article· en· W3153485348 on OpenAlex
Yusril Harun, Yunni Diansari, Selly Marisdina, Yuli Felistia

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMajalah Kedokteran Neurosains Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Saraf Indonesia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDonepezilMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMedicineCognitionPlaceboInternal medicineCognitive impairmentPsychologyDementiaPsychiatryDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EFFECTIVITY OF DONEPEZIL IN COGNITIVE FUNCTION OFPOSTOPERATIVE INTRACRANIAL TUMOUR PATIENTSABSTRACTIntroduction: There is still a lack of effective therapy in improving cognitive dysfunction in intracranial tumour patients after surgery. Donepezil is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that has been a therapy of Alzheimer's disease and has a significant effect on improving cognitive function.Aim: To determine the effectiveness of donepezil on cognitive function in patients with postoperative intracranial tumours.Methods: A clinical, randomized, double-blind study was conducted on postoperative intracranial tumour patients categorized into two groups (donepezil and placebo). The intervention was donepezil 5mg once a day for three months. For assessment of cognitive function, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Indonesian Version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-Ina) was checked at weeks 0 (baseline), 4 (end of the first month), 8 (end of the second month), and 12 (end of the third month). Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.Results: Twenty patients, equally distributed in two groups, were included in the study. Compared to baseline, MMSE and MoCA-Ina scores in the donepezil group increased significantly on the second and third month (p<0.001). There was a remarkable difference in cognitive function between two groups on the third month based on MMSE and MoCA-Ina scores (p=0.027 and 0.024, respectively). At post-intervention, orientation and recalldomain in MMSE showed marked improvement, while visuospatial and delayed recall domain experienced as well in MoCA-Ina. There were no significant side effects of donepezil.Discussion: This results can be considered for administration of donepezil in patients with intracranial tumours after surgery with impaired cognitive function.Keywords: Cognitive function, donepezil, intracranial tumour, MMSE, MoCA-Ina, surgeryABSTRAKPendahuluan: Saat ini belum ada terapi yang efektif dalam memperbaiki gangguan fungsi kognitif pada pasien tumor intrakranial pascaoperasi. Donepezil merupakan inhibitor asetilkolinesterase yang telah menjadi terapi dari penyakit Alzheimer dan memiliki efek yang bermakna dalam memperbaiki fungsi kognitif.Tujuan: Mengetahui efektivitas donepezil terhadap fungsi kognitif pasien tumor intrakranial pascaoperasi.Metode: Studi uji klinis, acak, tersamar ganda dilakukan pada pasien tumor intrakranial pascaoperasi dengan gangguan kognitif yang terbagi dalam dua kelompok (donepezil dan plasebo). Intervensi yang dilakukan berupa pemberian donepezil 5mg satu kali sehari selama 3 bulan. Evaluasi fungsi kognitif menggunakan Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) dan Montreal Cognitive Assessment Versi Indonesia (MoCA-Ina) pada minggu 0 (awal), 4 (akhir bulan ke-1), 8 (akhir bulan ke-2), dan 12 (akhir bulan ke-2). Data dianalisis menggunakan perangkat SPSS 22.Hasil: Sebanyak 20 subjek yang terbagi sama pada dua kelompok diikutsertakan pada penelitian ini. Dibandingkan dengan kondisi awal, nilai MMSE dan MoCA-Ina pada kelompok donepezil meningkat secara signifikan pada bulan ke-2 dan ke-3 (p<0,001). Terdapat perbedaan bermakna fungsi kognitif antara kelompok terapi dengan placebo pada bulan ke-3 berdasarkan nilai MMSE (p=0,027) dan MoCA-Ina (p=0,024). Domain pada MMSE yang mengalami perbaikan bermakna setelah terapi donepezil adalah orientasi dan recall, sedangkan pada MoCA-Ina adalah domain visuospasial dan delayed recall. Tidak didapatkan efek samping donepezil yang bermakna.Diskusi: Hasil penelitian ini dapat menjadi pertimbangan dalam pemberian donepezil pada pasien dengan tumor intrakranial pascaoperasi yang memiliki gangguan fungsi kognitif.Kata kunci: Donepezil, fungsi kognitif, MMSE, MoCA-Ina, operasi, tumor intrakranial

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it