MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3153711495 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2020-0555

Classical analytical description of negative hydrogen ions

2021· article· en· W3153711495 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eugene Oks

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsExcited stateAtomic physicsDipoleElectronIonProtonMoment (physics)HydrogenDeuteriumTokamakHydrogen atomQuantum mechanicsComputational physicsPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies of negative hydrogen ions (NHI), such as, H– and D–, are important from both practical and fundamental points of view. One of the reasons for their practical importance has to do with heating tokamak plasmas by external beams of NHI. Another practical use is the injection of NHI in high-power proton accelerator facilities to enhance their performance. In addition, NHI are also important for studies of opacities of the atmospheres of the Sun and of A-type stars. We present a classical analytical description of NHI in the situation where the underlying hydrogen (or deuterium) atom constitutes a rapid subsystem while the outer electron represents a slow subsystem. We focus on the case where the inner electron is in a circular state, so that the subsystem “nucleus plus inner electron” does not have the average electric dipole moment — in distinction to previous studies where the presence of the average dipole moment was the crucial requirement. By using the separation of rapid and slow subsystems, we show analytically that there is a classical bound state in such system and studied its parameters. In particular, we calculate analytically the primary frequency of the radiation of such system. This could be used for its experimental detection. The states that we found for the above systems could be considered as classical counterparts of the double-excited states of NHI previously studied in the literature in frames of quantum mechanics. The existence of classical counterparts of the double-excited states of NHI is a counterintuitive result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207