Painting by lesions: White matter hyperintensities disrupt functional networks and global cognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are a prominent feature of cerebral small vessel disease and are associated with cognitive impairment. These deficits in cognition may be caused by the disruption of large-scale functional networks due to the presence of WMHs. However, knowledge regarding the relevance of these lesions on functional networks remains inconclusive. These inconsistencies may derive from issues with interpreting functional imaging data from clinical populations. Lesion network mapping is a technique that allows the overlaying of lesions from a patient population to the functional connectivity of a human connectome derived from healthy adults. This allows researchers to identify functional networks that would be disrupted in a healthy population should the WMHs seen in cerebral small vessel disease be present. We hypothesized that the extent to which these functional networks are disrupted by WMHs is associated with cognitive performance in older adults with cerebral small vessel disease. This cross-sectional study combined baseline data from four studies to create a total sample of 164 older adults (aged ≥55) from metropolitan Vancouver with cerebral small vessel disease. Using lesion network mapping, we assessed the percentage overlap between voxels functionally connected with both the WMHs (lesion network) and five common functional networks: (1) visual; (2) dorsal attention; (3) ventral attention; (4) sensorimotor; and (5) frontoparietal. Cognition was assessed using: (1) Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); (2) Stroop Colour Word Test (3-2); (3) Trail Making Tests (Part B-A); and (4) Digit Symbol Substitution Test. A One-Way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests were performed to identify the functional networks with greatest percentage overlap with the lesion network. Partial correlations controlling for age were used to analyse whether the extent of the overlap between the lesion and functional networks was associated with poorer cognition. The visual, ventral attention, and frontoparietal networks had significantly greater overlap with the lesion network. After controlling for multiple comparisons, level of lesion network overlap with both the sensorimotor network (p<.001) and ventral attention network (p <. 001) was significantly correlated with MoCA score. Thus, the greater the disruption to the sensorimotor and ventral attention networks, the poorer the global cognition. Our results reveal that the visual, ventral attention, and frontoparietal networks are most vulnerable to disruptions stemming from WMHs. Additionally, we identified that disruption to the sensorimotor and ventral attention networks, as a result of WMHs, may underlie deficits in global cognition in older adults with cerebral small vessel disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".