Towards the Inclusion of Trans* Identities: Making Space and Creating Change in Postsecondary Institutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis examines the current climate of colleges and universities for trans* students in Canada. In accordance with poststructural theory, it is argued that meaning is constructed and maintained within the postsecondary social structure. An assessment of the language employed in administrative procedure, student documentation, and discrimination policies within thirteen Canadian institutions will show how the identities of trans* students must be recognized and respected to avoid systemic erasure. It will also illustrate how the gendered division of space serves to restrict access and render trans* bodies invisible. There is a dire need for linguistic and structural change in order to ensure the acknowledgement of trans* identities in all aspects of postsecondary life. This thesis calls upon postsecondary establishments to work towards the affirmation and inclusion of trans* identities while simultaneously working to address the underlying binarist, heterosexist, and cissexist structures that shape the institution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.043 | 0.054 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.023 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".