MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3154098278 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v74i2.3107

Soins plus — mise en place d’une intervention à trois volets visant à accroître la visibilité et la disponibilité du pharmacien dans un hôpital pédiatrique : une étude randomisée contrôlée

2021· article· fr· W3154098278 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Flaviu Mosora, Myriam Guèvremont, Gabriel Vézina, Karine Côté, Marianne Boulé, Denis Lebel, Jean‐François Bussières, Marie‐Élaine Métras

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicineGynecologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÉSUMÉ Contexte : Le rôle du pharmacien au sein de l’équipe multidisciplinaire est souvent méconnu. Diverses interventions peuvent être mises en place pour promouvoir le rôle du pharmacien en milieu hospitalier auprès des familles, des patients et des autres professionnels de la santé. Peu d’études décrivent la faisabilité et évaluent l’impact de ces interventions, particulièrement en pédiatrie. Objectifs : Décrire l’implantation d’une intervention à trois volets visant à accroître la visibilité du pharmacien et de son rôle dans l’équipe traitante, pour permettre d’optimiser les soins pharmaceutiques des patients hospitalisés dans les unités de pédiatrie générale du CHU Sainte-Justine, à Montréal (Québec). Comparer la perception et la satisfaction des parents de patients hospitalisés et des soignants recevant soit des soins pharmaceutiques usuels, ou soit des soins pharmaceutiques intégrant l’intervention. Méthode : Étude expérimentale randomisée contrôlée à simple aveugle portant sur des patients admis dans les unités de pédiatrie générale entre le 5 mars et le 8 août 2019. Outre des soins usuels, l’intervention comporte la remise d’une brochure d’information sur les services et soins pharmaceutiques, l’accès à une ligne téléphonique permettant aux familles et aux patients de prendre contact avec un résident en pharmacie pendant leur séjour à l’hôpital et jusqu’à un mois après le congé et le remplissage par le pharmacien responsable du patient d’un formulaire de congé standardisé. Un sondage de perception et de satisfaction a aussi été réalisé auprès des participants et des professionnels de la santé concernés. Résultats : Six cent quarante et un (641) participants ont été inclus dans l’étude, 321 dans le groupe intervention et 320 dans le groupe témoin. La brochure a été remise à tous les parents du groupe intervention. Douze appels téléphoniques ont été faits au moyen d’une ligne téléphonique spéciale. Le formulaire de congé standardisé de 46,7 % (150/321) des participants du groupe intervention a été rempli. Une majorité des parents et des patients ayant répondu au sondage (81,2 %, 298/367) se disent satisfaits des services et des soins pharmaceutiques reçus dans les deux groupes. Une proportion de 83,9 % des participants du groupe intervention se disent satisfaits des soins et services pharmaceutiques reçus comparativement à 78,5 % du groupe témoin (p = 0,18). De plus, 60,3 % (111/184) des participants du groupe intervention disent que l’information transmise pendant l’hospitalisation concernant les médicaments leur a apporté de nouvelles connaissances, contre 48,1 % (87/181) des participants du groupe témoin (p = 0,019). Les résultats du sondage montrent que les soignants sont en accord avec l’intervention. Conclusion : Les trois volets de l’intervention ont été implantés dans les unités de pédiatrie sur une période de cinq mois. Cette intervention est perçue comme étant positive par les parents et les soignants concernés et les répondants ont été majoritairement satisfaits des services et des soins pharmaceutiques offerts. ABSTRACT Background: The pharmacist’s role within the multidisciplinary team is often poorly understood. Various interventions can be put into place to promote the role of the pharmacist in the hospital setting with families, patients, and other health care professionals. Few studies have described the feasibility and assessed the impact of such interventions, particularly in pediatrics. Objectives: To describe the implementation of a 3-part intervention aimed at increasing the visibility of pharmacists and their role on the treatment team, with the goal of optimizing the pharmaceutical care of hospitalized patients in the general pediatric units of CHU Sainte-Justine, in Montréal, Quebec, and to compare the perceptions and satisfaction of patients’ parents and of health care professionals with exposure to either usual pharmaceutical care or to pharmaceutical care incorporating the intervention. Methods: This single-blind, randomized, controlled experimental study involved patients admitted to general pediatric units between March 5 and August 8, 2019. In addition to usual care, the intervention included delivery of an information brochure about pharmaceutical services and care, access to a telephone line (which allowed families and patients to contact a pharmacy resident during their stay in hospital and up to 1 month after discharge), and completion of a standardized discharge form by the pharmacist responsible for the patient. The participants and health professionals concerned were surveyed to determine their perceptions and level of satisfaction. Results: A total of 641 participants were included in the study, 321 in the intervention group and 320 in the control group. The brochure was given to all parents in the intervention group. Twelve phone calls were made through the dedicated telephone line. The standardized discharge form was completed for 46.7% (150/321) of the participants in the intervention group. Most of the parents and patients who responded to the survey, in either group (81.2%, 298/367), reported satisfaction with the pharmaceutical services and care received. Of participants in the intervention group, 83.9% were satisfied with the pharmaceutical care and services received, compared with 78.5% of those in the control group (p = 0.18). In addition, 60.3% (111/184) of participants in the intervention group said that the information about medications that was provided during the hospital stay gave them new knowledge, compared with 48.1% (87/181) of those in the control group (p = 0.019). The results of the survey showed that care providers were in agreement with the intervention. Conclusions: The 3 components of the intervention were implemented in the pediatric units over a period of 5 months. The intervention was perceived as positive by the parents and care providers concerned, and the respondents were mostly satisfied with the services and pharmaceutical care offered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes→French-language works237,207→