MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154146194 · doi:10.7202/1074335ar

‘Latens Deitas’: The Holy Sacrament Altarpiece of Dieric Bouts

2021· article· fr· W3154146194 on OpenAlexaffvenue
William Dale

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSAINTArtPhilosophyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À travers les grandes lignes de composition des cinq panneaux du Retable du Saint-Sacrement de Dierck Bouts, on peut découvrir les formes cachées de lettres grecques révélant les monogrammes sacrés Alpha-Omega et Chi-Ro , et le nom médiéval contracté de Jesu . L’auteur relie le dessin de ces lettres aux alphabets fantastiques de l’époque, mais il conclut que leur emploi cryptographique est l’invention de Bouts, qui a voulu ainsi exprimer dans son retable la « présence cachée » du Christ dans le Saint-Sacrement et dans les sources de l’Ancien Testament. Le thème du retable et son illustration semblent d’autre part avoir été inspirés par les textes de la Messe et des Offices de la Fête du Saint-Sacrement de Thomas d’Aquin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRACAR Revue d art canadienneSame topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207