MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154150820 · doi:10.35259/isi.2021_46670

Developing a lab-in-a-box and low-cost paper-based sensors for ZIKV and CHIKV diagnosis in Latin America

2021· article· en· W3154150820 on OpenAlexaff
Margot Karlikow, Severino Silva, Yuxiu Guo, Seray Cicek, Larissa Krokovsky, Alexander Green, Constância Flávia Junqueira Ayres, Lindomar Pena, Keith Pardee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZika virusComputer scienceVirologyComputational biologyBiologyGenomeVirusGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Zika virus (ZIKV) has emerged as a major global public health concern in the last five years due to its link as a causative agent of congenital malformations in thousands of newborns. Currently, the reverse transcriptase reaction followed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is considered the reference method to diagnose ZIKV-infection. Nevertheless, RT-qPCR requires technical expertise and utilizes specialized equipment for amplification and detection of viral genome. These drawbacks negatively impact the establishment of effective disease control programs caused by ZIKV, especially in low-resource areas. This bottleneck in diagnostic capacity led to calls for molecular diagnostics that can be used at the point-of-care (POC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingFrench-language works237,207