Racismo y universidades en el Ecuador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El artículo analiza la situación del racismo en las universidades ecuatorianas, desde la revisión de marcos jurídicos, prácticas y procedimientos institucionales referentes al acceso a la educación superior de indígenas y afroecuatorianos, su permanencia, graduación y la incorporación de los saberes y cosmovisiones indígenas y afros. El estudio concluye que pese a los avances en el mejoramiento del sistema de educación superior y la declaración de la necesidad de la interculturalidad en la Constitución y en la Ley Orgánica de Educación Superior, existe el escaso interés de las universidades por procesar las demandas de los dos grupos étnicos, y la interculturalidad no constituye en el enfoque transversal de todo el sistema de educación superior. Asimismo, se demuestra que los indígenas y afroecuatorianos, especialmente las mujeres, continúan excluidos de la educación superior, hecho que empeora la calidad de vida y aumenta las brechas de desigualdad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".