MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intimacy and Sexual Relationships

2016· other· en· W3154610775 on OpenAlexaff
Carolyn Birnie‐Porter

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRomancePsychologySexual relationshipSexual attractionSocial psychologyDevelopmental psychologySexual behaviorSexual desireHuman sexualityGender studiesSociologyPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intimacy is an important quality in romantic and sexual relationships and is associated with greater overall well‐being. Current research on intimacy focuses on the dyadic nature of intimate experiences, where individuals both disclose important information about themselves and are responsive to each other. Intimacy is especially relevant for sexual relationships, given that perceiving one's partner as being responsive during sexual activity (i.e., as being understanding, caring, and accepting) is associated with greater sexual satisfaction. Intimacy during sexual activity, also known as sexual intimacy, is related to but distinct from intimacy in general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality StudiesSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207