MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154626843

PLAGAS TRANSFRONTERIZAS INTERCEPTADAS EN EL AEREOPUERTO JARDINES DEL REY / CROSS-BORDER PESTS INTERCEPTED IN JARDINES DEL REY AIRPORT

2020· article· es· W3154626843 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rafael Antonio Dorta Pérez, Maita E. Avila Espinosa, Miguel Ángel Iparraguirre Cruz

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversidad&Ciencia · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect behavior and control techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCeratitis capitataHumanitiesBiologyHorticulturePEST analysisTephritidaeArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente trabajo se realizo en el punto de entrada del Aeropuerto Jardines del Rey, con el objetivo de determinar el ingreso de plagas transfronterizas desde el ano 2013 al 2017. Se decomisaron 3782,8 Kg de frutos, vegetales y semillas y en estos se realizaron 279 intercepciones. En los decomisos se observaron 124 muestras con huevos y adultos de Panonychus ulmis (Koch), 43 con Aonidiella aurantii , 37 Crysomphalum aonidum y Tetranychus tumidus Banks con 35. Se intercepto Tetranychus pacificus McGregor en fresa, procedente de Canada, con importancia cuarentenaria para nuestro pais y no hubo captura de Ceratitis capitata . Se sugiere un Analisis de Riesgo para Plagas Cuarentenarias en los frutales y fortalecer el conocimiento de los inspectores de cuarentena en prediagnostico de Acaros e insectos como las moscas del genero Ceratitis, Bactrocera y Anastrepha .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversidad&CienciaSame topicInsect behavior and control techniquesFrench-language works237,207