MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154710670 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.10308

Photogrammetric Stereoplotting of the Theodosian Palace at the Ancient Site of Stobi, Republic of Macedonia: Reviving a 20th Century Technique for the 21st Century

2018· article· en· W3154710670 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kavita Mistry

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthophotoPhotogrammetryEmperorComputer scienceArchaeologyGeologyArtComputer graphics (images)CartographyVisual artsArtificial intelligenceGeographyHistoryAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The so called “Theodosian Palace” at the site of Stobi in the Republic of Macedonia was built in the 4th century AD and was thought to have been the temporary residence of the Roman emperor Theodosius I when he visited the city in 388 AD. This large structure was richly decorated with coloured marbles and mosaics, many of which have been restored over the years. Unfortunately, the walls that were consolidated prior to 2013 are now suffering serious deterioration and a proposal for this work is now being put together. As a necessary component of this proposal, stone-by-stone top-plans and elevation drawings are crucial to map the current state of these walls. Manual drawings using tape measures, plumb bobs and graph paper is immensely time consuming for such a large structure. As an alternative to these methods, we have employed Photogrammetric Stereoplotting to produce an accurate map of the Theodosian Palace. Using hundreds of overlapping photos taken of the walls with ground control points surveyed by a total station, highly accurate (<1cm) 3D data was generated using photogrammetric techniques. Individual stereo-models were then mapped in ADAMTech 3DM Analyst. Stereoplotting offers a faster and cost effective solution than manually mapping on site. By using hardware developed for the videogame industry -- active LCD glasses and high refresh-rate monitors -- mapping in 3D allows us to identify the shape and depth of the rocks and structures more accurately and intuitively than on a two-dimensional orthophoto. Once stereoplotted, the drawings are then inputted into AutoCAD Map 3D.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topic3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207