Prediction of Target-Drug Therapy by Identifying Gene Mutations in Lung Cancer With Histopathological Stained Image and Deep Learning Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lung cancer is a kind of cancer with high morbidity and mortality which is associated with various gene mutations. Individualized targeted-drug therapy has become the optimized treatment of lung cancer, especially benefit for patients who are not qualified for lung lobectomy. It is crucial to accurately identify mutant genes within tumor region from stained pathological slice. Therefore, we mainly focus on identifying mutant gene of lung cancer by analyzing the pathological images. In this study, we have proposed a method by identifying gene mutations in lung cancer with histopathological stained image and deep learning to predict target-drug therapy, referred to as DeepIMLH. The DeepIMLH algorithm first downloaded 180 hematoxylin-eosin staining (H&E) images of lung cancer from the Cancer Gene Atlas (TCGA). Then deep convolution Gaussian mixture model (DCGMM) was used to perform color normalization. Convolutional neural network (CNN) and residual network (Res-Net) were used to identifying mutated gene from H&E stained imaging and achieved good accuracy. It demonstrated that our method can be used to choose targeted-drug therapy which might be applied to clinical practice. More studies should be conducted though.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".