KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES AMONG THE GENERAL PUBLIC TOWARDS SALT CONSUMPTION IN OMAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Increased dietary salt intake is a major health concern. Many steps have been taken worldwide to increase awareness. The aim of our study was to assess the knowledge and attitudes of the general public in Oman regarding the dangers of high salt intake. Design and method: This was a cross sectional questionnaire based survey that was conducted among the general public in Oman. The questionnaire was based on the WHO questionnaire which has been previously validated. It was translated into Arabic by local professionals and translated back to English to check the accuracy of the translation. The questionnaire was distributed at public events and also electronically via google docs. All individuals aged 18 and above were invited to fill in the questionnaire. Results: A total of 1214 respondents (age 34 + 10 years, 65.8% male, 69.4% employed,14.2% hypertensive) answered the questionnaire. More than two thirds of the participants felt that they were consuming the right amount of salt (69.4%) while only 6.7% thought that they were consuming more than they should. Most of the respondents always add salt while cooking (80%), and sometimes or always add salt at the table (61.4%). Most (90.7%) were aware that excess salt can cause diseases such as hypertension and that it is either somewhat important (51.2%) or very important (43.2%) to reduce salt in the diet. However only 42% said that they actively try to reduce salt in their diet. Only around a quarter check the label of the food for salt content before they buy. Only 54 (4.4%) said they knew what the recommended limit of salt intake is, but only 5 got it correct. By binary regression, the factors that determine whether or not a person tries to reduce salt in diet were age, sex, educational level and occupation (all p < 0.001). However, being hypertensive was not a predictor. Conclusions: Although most people in Oman in our sample appear to be aware of the dangers of high salt intake, only a few are actively trying to reduce it. More educational activities are required to improve awareness especially among the hypertensive patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".