MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154856957 · doi:10.33322/energi.v12i2.1173

Redesain penampang kabel wiring APP pelanggan TM untuk perbaikan akurasi pengukuran kWh

2020· article· en· W3154856957 on OpenAlexaff
Fadjar Kurniadi

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergi & Kelistrikan · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsPositive Living North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcurementElectrical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringPhysicsBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Current Transfomer(CT) accuracy for big customers is very important. Constraints Execution of CT accuracy testing on big customers is quite a lot of customers and scattered, and longtime outage duration. Development of electronic kwh Meter for checking on-site CT customers as a solution to these problems. The onsite CT measurement method is carried out by comparing the primary and secondary of the CT by utilizing the current coil on the electronic kWh Meter. This method has several advantages, lower costs, easy procurement, easy and fast operation, so the duration of outages can be minimized. This method is very supportive in the implementation of the Revenue Assurance program. Keywords: English, , 3-5 words ABSTRAK Akurasi CT (Current Transfomer) pada pelanggan besar sangat penting. Kendala Pelaksanaan pengujian akurasi CT pada pelanggan besar adalah pelanggan cukup banyak dan tersebar, dan waktu pemadaman yang lama. Pengembangan kwh Meter Alat untuk pengecekan CT Pelanggan secara on site sebagai solusi permasalahan tersebut. Metode penugukuran CT onsite dilaksanakan dengan membandingkan sisi primer dan sekunder CT dengan memanfaatkan kumparan arus pada kWh Meter elektronik. Metode ini memiliki beberapa keuntungan, antara lain biaya lebih murah, mudah pengadaan,mudah dan cepat dalam pengoperasiannya sehingga lama pemadaman dapat diminimalkan. Cara ini sangat mendukung dalam pelaksanaan program Revenue Assurance dalam memastikan kebenaran CT yang terpasang. Kata kunci: Electronic Meter, CT Testing

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0960.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergi & KelistrikanSame topicEngineering and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207