Multi‐objective <scp>Deng's</scp> grey incidence analysis, orthogonal optimization, and artificial neural network modelling in hot‐maceration‐assisted extraction of <scp>African</scp> cucumber leaves ( <scp> <i>Momordica balsamina</i> </scp> )
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Due to the inherent multiple response characteristics in many biological and separation processes, parameter optimization and modelling is usually a daunting task. The integration of Deng's grey incidence model (GRA) and Taguchi optimization (TM) therefore helps in transforming multiple quality characteristics into a single response presented as the grey relational grade (GRG). This was applied to optimize the multiple quality response characteristics in the maceration‐assisted extraction of African cucumber leaves. Two responses and five design factors were selected with L 16 (2 5 ) layout using signal‐to‐noise ratio as a point prediction feature. Under the optimized conditions, the optimum total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of 0.8569 mg/ml gallic acid equivalence and 0.9259 mg/ml were achieved, respectively. The mass ratio was the highest contributor (38.2%), whereas the maceration time presented the least contribution (9.8%) to the cumulative response grade (GRG). In the neural network analysis, three models were deployed: Levenberg Marquardt backpropagation neural network (LMNN), gradient descent with adaptive learning rate neural network (GDALRNN), and the resilient back‐propagation neural network (RPNN). A better prediction of hold‐out data was achieved with the GDALRNN model, generating lesser absolute deviation error ( MAD GDALRNN = 0.099), root mean square error ( RMSE GDALRNN = 0.1033), relative mean bias error ( rMBE GDALRNN = − 0.24), and highest computational time (CT GDALRNN = 8.8), which is expected of an effective model. Based on the GRG and the signal‐to‐noise ratio, the optimum conditions and the neural network model succinctly provided a benchmark for future assessment of complex relationship among extraction variables, which could form the basis for a potential future scale‐up applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".