MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154931188 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.9465

26. Investigating the Role of Neuropeptide Y Infusions to the Ventral Hippocampus in Mediating Defensive Burying Behavior in Rats in the Shock-Probe Test

2018· article· en· W3154931188 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Samuel Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHippocampusNeuroscienceNeuropeptide Y receptorNeuropeptidePsychologyAnxietyInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyMedicineReceptorPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current study will investigate the role of NPY in the ventral hippocampus in anxiety. NPY is a neuropeptide found in many structures in the brain, including the hippocampus, and is implicated in regulation of anxiety related behaviors. The hippocampus has also been found to play a role in anxiety and defensive behaviors – specifically, the ventral hippocampus regulates innate defensive behaviors. The effect of NPY in the ventral hippocampus will be investigated by infusing either NPY (n=12) or physiological saline (n=12) into the rat ventral hippocampus followed by behavioural testing in an animal model of anxiety; i.e., the shock-probe burying task. I expect to find a selective reduction in burying duration in NPY-infused rats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207