Joint Channel and Phase Noise Estimation and Data Detection for GFDM
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Generalized frequency division multiplexing (GFDM), an enabler of beyond-5G wireless networks, can be critically impaired due to radio frequency (RF) phase noise. However, joint channel estimation and phase noise compensation for GFDM systems have not been addressed before. Hence, we tackle this problem. To this end, we propose an iterative algorithm for joint channel and phase noise estimation and two algorithms for joint data detection and phase noise compensation. These algorithms use linear and non-linear least-squares (NLS) methods and employ block-type and comb-type pilots. The complexity of these algorithms is also analyzed. Moreover, to reduce their complexity, interpolation techniques are deployed to decrease the number of unknowns. We also analyze the signal-to-interference-plus noise ratio (SINR) and sum-rate of GFDM contaminated with phase noise. Furthermore, the accuracy of the channel and phase noise estimates is established via Cramér-Rao lower bounds (CRLBs). The simulation results illustrate that the mean-squared error (MSE) performance of the proposed joint channel and phase noise estimator reaches the CRLB. Moreover, the proposed joint data symbol detection and phase noise compensation algorithms nearly eliminate the impacts of phase noise in GFDM systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it