The density of calretinin striatal interneurons is decreased in 6-OHDA-lesioned mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Interneurons play a significant role in the functional organization of the striatum and some of them display marked plastic changes in dopamine-depleted conditions. Here, we applied immunohistochemistry on brain sections from 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) mouse model of Parkinson’s disease and sham animals to characterize the regional distribution and the morphological and neurochemical changes of striatal interneurons expressing the calcium binding protein calretinin (CR). Two morphological subtypes of calretinin-immunostained (CR+) interneurons referred respectively as small and medium-sized CR+ interneurons were detected in 6-OHDA and sham-lesioned animals. The small cells (9-12 µm) prevail in the anterior and dorsal striatal regions; they stain intensely for CR and display a single slightly varicose and moderately arborized process. The medium-sized CR+ interneurons (15-20 µm) are slightly more numerous than the small CR+ cells and rather uniformly distributed within the striatum; they stain weakly for CR and display 2-3 long, slightly varicose and poorly branched dendrites. The density of medium CR+ interneurons is significantly decreased in the dopamine-depleted striatum (158 ± 15 neurons/mm3), when compared to sham animals (370 ± 41 neurons/mm3), whereas that of the small-sized CR+ interneurons is unchanged (174 ± 46 neurons/mm3 in 6-OHDA-lesioned striatum and 164 ± 22 neurons/mm3 in sham-lesioned striatum). The nucleus accumbens is populated only by medium-sized CR+ interneurons, which are distributed equally among the core and shell compartments and whose density is unaltered after dopamine denervation. Our results provide the first evidence that the medium-sized striatal interneurons expressing low level of CR are specifically targeted by dopamine denervation, while the small and intensely immunoreactive CR+ cells remain unaffected. These findings suggest that high expression of the calcium binding protein CR might protect striatal interneurons against an increase in intracellular calcium level that is believed to arise from altered glutamate corticostriatal transmission in Parkinson’s disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".