<i>E</i>–<i>Z</i> Isomerization Mechanism of the Green Fluorescent Protein Chromophore: Remote Regulation by Proton Dissociation of the Phenol Group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dronpa, a GFP (green fluorescent protein)-like fluorescent protein, allows its fluorescent and nonfluorescent states to be switched to each other reversibly by light or heat through E–Z isomerization of the GFP chromophore. In this article, a GFP chromophore (p-HBDI) in water is used as a model to explore this E–Z isomerization mechanism. Based on the experimental solvent isotope effect (kH2O/kD2O = 2.30), the E–Z isomerization of p-HBDI in water is suggested to go through the remote-proton-dissociation-regulated direct mechanism with a proton transfer in the rate-determining step. The fractionation factor (ϕ) of the water-associated phenol proton of p-HBDI in the transition state is found to be 0.43, which is exactly in the range of 0.1–0.6 for the fractionation factor (ϕ) of the transferring proton in the transition state of R2O···H···O+H2 in water. This means that the phenol proton of E-p-HBDI in the transition state is on the way to the associated water oxygen during the E–Z isomerization. The proton dissociation from the phenol group of p-HBDI remotely regulates its E–Z isomerization. Less proton dissociation from the phenol group (pKa = 8.0) at pH = 1–4 results in a modest reduction in the E–Z isomerization rate of p-HBDI, while complete proton dissociation from the phenol group at pH = 11–12 also reduces its E–Z isomerization rate by one order of magnitude because of the larger charge separation in the transition state of the p-HBDI anion. All of these results are consistent with the remote-proton-dissociation-regulated direct mechanism but against the water-assisted addition/elimination mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".