Land Cover Classification of Multispectral LiDAR Data With an Efficient Self-Attention Capsule Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Periodically conducting land cover mapping plays a vital role in monitoring the status and changes of the land use. The up-to-date and accurate land use database serves importantly for a wide range of applications. This letter constructs an efficient self-attention capsule network (ESA-CapsNet) for land cover classification of multispectral light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data. First, formulated with a novel capsule encoder–decoder architecture, the ESA-CapsNet performs promisingly in extracting high-level, informative, and strong feature semantics for pixel-wise land cover classification by using the five types of rasterized feature images. Furthermore, designed with a novel capsule-based attention module, the channel and spatial feature encodings are comprehensively exploited to boost the feature saliency and robustness. The ESA-CapsNet is evaluated on two multispectral LiDAR data sets and achieves an advantageous performance with the overall accuracy, average accuracy, and kappa coefficient of over 98.42%, 95.15%, and 0.9776, respectively. Comparative experiments with the existing methods also demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of the ESA-CapsNet in land cover classification tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".