MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3155133187 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-36199/v1

Blood manganese and cognitive and motor skills at age 6-7 in Canadian cohort GESTE

2020· preprint· en· W3155133187 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Luc Staedelin, Nadia Abdelouahab, Anne-Sandrine Desautels, Virginie Gillet, Amélie Boivin, Erin Wilkie, Marie Farmer, Kasey Brennan, Hannah E. Laue, Christian Bocti, Andrea Baccarelli, Larissa Takser

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCohortManganeseCognitionMedicinePsychologyNeuroscienceInternal medicineMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Increasing evidence suggests that high exposure to manganese (Mn) may impair brain development. In Canada, Mn exposure comes from several environmental sources and the most common is drinking water. Our objective was to examine the relationship between blood Mn and psychomotor skills in school-aged children from the Eastern Townships, Qc, Canada. In addition, we examined the association of Mn with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) diagnosis in our study group.Methods: Children were recruited at birth (through their mother) and followed prospectively. At 6-7 years of age, 210 children provided a blood sample for manganese testing and underwent a battery of neuropsychological tests. This battery assessed several major cognitive domains including general intelligence, attention and others via subtests from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – IV (WISC-IV), the Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment-II (NEPSYII) and the Test of Everyday Attention for Children (TEACH). Parents were asked if their child had ever received a physician diagnosis of ADHD. Blood was analysed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Multivariate statistic modelling was used to control for potential confounding factors, including blood lead.Results: Median blood Mn was 9.9 µg/L (range 4.7 – 21.4 µg/L). The Design Copying – Fine motor score of the NEPSYII was positively associated with blood Mn (linear model β: 0.17 [95% Confidence Interval: 0.03 to 0.32]; adjusted model β: 0.16 [95% Confidence Interval 0.01 to 0.30]). Blood Mn was not associated with diagnosis of ADHD. Sex-stratified analyses indicated potential effect modification by child sex such that manganese had a beneficial association on the Score DT test (a measure of sustained attention), but only among boys (β: 0.29, [95% confidence interval: 0.098 to 0.49]) Conclusions: In agreement with studies from areas with similar environmental Mn levels, our study suggests that blood Mn level does not have wide-ranging associations with cognitive functions, psychomotor skills, or a diagnosis/suspicion of ADHD in school-aged children. To resolve the controversy about toxicity of environmental Mn on the developing brain, further studies should simultaneously focus on several biomarkers of Mn exposure, potential lifestyle protective factors, as well as brain imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityFrench-language works237,207