MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3155150813 · doi:10.1101/2021.04.19.440501

Multi-scale semi-supervised clustering of brain images: deriving disease subtypes

2021· preprint· en· W3155150813 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Junhao Wen, Erdem Varol, Aristeidis Sotiras, Zhijian Yang, Ganesh B. Chand, Güray Erus, Haochang Shou, Ahmed Abdulkadir, Gyujoon Hwang, Dominic Dwyer, Alessandro Pigoni, Paola Dazzan, René S. Kahn, Hugo G. Schnack, Marcus V. Zanetti, Eva Meisenzahl, Geraldo F. Busatto, Benedicto Crespo‐Facorro, Christos Pantelis, Stephen J. Wood, Chuanjun Zhuo, Russell T. Shinohara, Yong Fan, Ruben C. Gur, Raquel E. Gur, Theodore D. Satterthwaite, Nikolaos Koutsouleris, Daniel H. Wolf

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SServierEisaiNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationPfizerBiogenBioClinicaF. Hoffmann-La RocheUniversity of Southern CaliforniaEuropean CommissionEli Lilly and CompanyU.S. Department of DefenseMeso Scale DiagnosticsAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationBristol-Myers SquibbNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's AssociationFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Scale (ratio)Identification (biology)Machine learningData miningBiologyCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disease heterogeneity is a significant obstacle to understanding pathological processes and delivering precision diagnostics and treatment. Clustering methods have gained popularity for stratifying patients into subpopulations (i.e., subtypes) of brain diseases using imaging data. However, unsupervised clustering approaches are often confounded by anatomical and functional variations not related to a disease or pathology of interest. Semi-supervised clustering techniques have been proposed to overcome this and, therefore, capture disease-specific patterns more effectively. An additional limitation of both unsupervised and semi-supervised conventional machine learning methods is that they typically model, learn and infer from data using a basis of feature sets pre-defined at a fixed anatomical or functional scale (e.g., atlas-based regions of interest). Herein we propose a novel method, “Multi-scAle heteroGeneity analysIs and Clustering” (MAGIC), to depict the multi-scale presentation of disease heterogeneity, which builds on a previously proposed semi-supervised clustering method, HYDRA. It derives multi-scale and clinically interpretable feature representations and exploits a double-cyclic optimization procedure to effectively drive identification of inter-scale-consistent disease subtypes. More importantly, to understand the conditions under which the clustering model can estimate true heterogeneity related to diseases, we conducted extensive and systematic semi-simulated experiments to evaluate the proposed method on a sizeable healthy control sample from the UK Biobank (N=4403). We then applied MAGIC to imaging data from Alzheimer’s disease (ADNI, N =1728) and schizophrenia (PHENOM, N =1166) patients to demonstrate its potential and challenges in dissecting the neuroanatomical heterogeneity of common brain diseases. Taken together, we aim to provide guidance regarding when such analyses can succeed or should be taken with caution. The code of the proposed method is publicly available at https://github.com/anbai106/MAGIC . Highlights We propose a novel multi-scale semi-supervised clustering method, termed MAGIC, to disentangle the heterogeneity of brain diseases. We perform extensive semi-simulated experiments on large control samples (UK Biobank, N =4403) to precisely quantify performance under various conditions, including varying degrees of brain atrophy, different levels of heterogeneity, overlapping disease subtypes, class imbalance, and varying sample sizes. We apply MAGIC to MCI and Alzheimer’s disease (ADNI, N =1728) and schizophrenia (PHENOM, N =1166) patients to dissect their neuroanatomical heterogeneity, providing guidance regarding the use of the semi-simulated experiments to validate the subtypes found in actual clinical applications. Graphical abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicMachine Learning in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207