Le sociogramme de l’« Indien » chez James Fenimore Cooper et Jules Verne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude repose sur l’hypothèse voulant que l’oeuvre romanesque de James Fenimore Cooper constitue la matrice fondamentale de l’imaginaire transatlantique des Premières Nations. Le roman Le dernier des Mohicans (1826), en particulier, aurait joué un rôle déterminant dans la synthèse et la diffusion de mythes informant la conception euroaméricaine des populations autochtones. L’oeuvre de Cooper présente ainsi ce que la sociocritique appellerait un « sociogramme de l’“Indien” » : différentes réalités ethnologiques y sont représentées de manière contrastée, c’est-à-dire tantôt de manière négative, tantôt de manière positive, de sorte que les Leatherstocking Tales, pas plus que le roman Famille-sans-nom (dans lequel Jules Verne adapte et infléchit certains éléments des romans de Cooper pour créer une image fantasmatique de la Huronie), ne permettent une lecture univoque. La matrice essentielle de ce que Georges E. Sioui appelle « la vision linéaire eurogène » s’y trouve néanmoins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".