MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3155263170 · doi:10.7202/1076341ar

Le sociogramme de l’« Indien » chez James Fenimore Cooper et Jules Verne

2021· article· fr· W3155263170 on OpenAlex
Maxime Prévost

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueTangence · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude repose sur l’hypothèse voulant que l’oeuvre romanesque de James Fenimore Cooper constitue la matrice fondamentale de l’imaginaire transatlantique des Premières Nations. Le roman Le dernier des Mohicans (1826), en particulier, aurait joué un rôle déterminant dans la synthèse et la diffusion de mythes informant la conception euroaméricaine des populations autochtones. L’oeuvre de Cooper présente ainsi ce que la sociocritique appellerait un « sociogramme de l’“Indien” » : différentes réalités ethnologiques y sont représentées de manière contrastée, c’est-à-dire tantôt de manière négative, tantôt de manière positive, de sorte que les Leatherstocking Tales , pas plus que le roman Famille-sans-nom (dans lequel Jules Verne adapte et infléchit certains éléments des romans de Cooper pour créer une image fantasmatique de la Huronie), ne permettent une lecture univoque. La matrice essentielle de ce que Georges E. Sioui appelle « la vision linéaire eurogène » s’y trouve néanmoins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it