Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deux états existentiels s’entrelacent dans les mémoires de Jean-Dominique Bauby, intitulées Le scaphandre et le papillon. Mon analyse, dans le cadre du cours Le cinéma aujourd’hui : Études thématiques (FREN 427), traite de la dualité de la condition humaine et de ses formes visuelles dans l’interprétation cinématographique des mémoires de Bauby. Les cinéphiles sont transportés dans un corps souffrant du syndrôme locked-in. Je tiens à interpréter la manière dont l’âme de Bauby, séquestrée par son corps, contrôle le jeu de caméra tout au long du film. Lorsque Bauby est en état asthénique, le point de vue de la caméra est restreint à sa vision. En contraste, la caméra peut également s’envoler de cette limite corporelle à travers son imagination. De là naissent les métaphores du scaphandre et du papillon. En maîtrisant l’imagerie symbolique et le jeu de caméra, le film Le scaphandre et le papillon réussit à donner un sens visuel à la pesanteur et à la légèreté de la condition humaine
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".