MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3155584919 · doi:10.1049/cit2.12034

Constrained tolerance rough set in incomplete information systems

2021· article· en· W3155584919 on OpenAlexaff
Renxia Wan, Duoqian Miao, Witold Pedrycz

Bibliographic record

VenueCAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRough setRelation (database)Set (abstract data type)Matching (statistics)MathematicsObject (grammar)Mathematical proofData miningClass (philosophy)Degree (music)Computer scienceNull (SQL)Theoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The tolerance rough set is developed as one of the outstanding extensions of the Pawlak's rough set model under incomplete information, and the limited tolerance relation is developed to overcome the problem that objects leniently satisfy the tolerance relation. However, the classification based on the limited tolerance relationship cannot reflect the matching degree of uncertain information of objects. In this article, we explore the influence of null values in an incomplete system, and propose the constrained tolerance relation based on the matching degree of uncertain information of objects. The proposed rough set based on the constrained tolerance relation can provide a more detailed structure of an object class through threshold. Proofs and example analyses further show the rationality and superiority of the proposed model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCAAI Transactions on Intelligence TechnologySame topicRough Sets and Fuzzy LogicFrench-language works237,207