MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3155643169 · doi:10.1063/5.0044490

Broadband all-silicon hybrid plasmonic TM-pass polarizer using bend waveguides

2021· article· en· W3155643169 on OpenAlexafffund
Md. Ghulam Saber, David V. Plant, Nicolás Abadía

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP Advances · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilFaculty of Engineering, McGill UniversitySPIE
KeywordsExtinction ratioInsertion lossMaterials sciencePolarizerSiliconPlasmonOptoelectronicsFabricationOpticsCMOSBroadbandBandwidth (computing)TelecommunicationsPhysicsWavelengthComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A complementary–metal–oxide semiconductor (CMOS) compatible all-silicon TM-pass polarizer using plasmonic bends is proposed. To simplify the fabrication and be compatible with the CMOS process, we employ only two materials: silicon and silicon dioxide. Highly doped silicon is used to support the plasmons. We obtain an extinction ratio and an insertion loss of 45.4 and 1.7 dB, respectively, at 1550 nm and a maximum extinction ratio of 58 dB. This is the highest reported extinction ratio for a TM-pass polarizer to the best of our knowledge. Furthermore, we achieved >20 dB of extinction ratio and <2 dB of insertion loss over 72 nm bandwidth for a device footprint <8.8 × 5.4 μm2. To achieve this, we exploit the properties of tight bends in plasmonic waveguides. Another advantage of the device is that it is robust against fabrication variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP AdvancesSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207