MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3155653647 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1530

Finite-time extremum seeking control for a class of unknown static maps

2020· article· en· W3155653647 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Guay

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtremum Seeking Control Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Stability (learning theory)Function (biology)Control (management)Class (philosophy)MathematicsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an extremum-seeking control design that achieves finite-time stability of the optimum an unknown measured cost function. The finite-time extremum-seeking control technique is shown to achieve finite-time practical stability of the optimum of the unknown cost function. The main characteristic of the proposed extremum seeking control approach is that the target averaged system considered achieves finite-time stability of the unknown optimum. A simulation study is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicExtremum Seeking Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207