MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A gridded inventory for global CFC-11 emissions from 2008 to 2019

2020· article· en· W3155666792 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jian‐Xiong Sheng, Ronald G. Prinn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmission inventoryEnvironmental scienceProxy (statistics)ClimatologyPer capitaPopulationEast AsiaMeteorologyInversion (geology)ChinaGeographyAtmospheric sciencesMathematicsAir quality indexStatisticsDemographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CFC-11 is a potent ozone depleting gas and is regulated under the Montreal Protocol. The rate of decline in global CFC-11 concentrations has slowed since 2013 largely due to the renewed, increasing emissions from eastern China (Montzka et al, Nature, 2018; Rigby et al, Nature, 2019). However, regional inversions suggest that this increase only accounts for 40-60% of the global rise. Therefore, there is an urgent need for emission estimates in other regions or countries. A global 3D inversion of atmospheric measurements is essential to improve our understanding of CFC-11 emission trends and sources, but it requires a reliable emission inventory as a prior estimate. In this study, we develop a gridded bottom-up inventory of global CFC-11 emissions from 2008 to 2019. Our inventory is driven by various, gridded proxy datasets including population, energy consumption, GDP per capita, and industrial clusters. A machine learning model is built between the proxy data and the previous emission estimates for eastern China, Korea, and Japan derived from inversions of AGAGE and NOAA surface measurements (Rigby et al, Nature, 2019). Our model is cross-validated in the East Asia and then applied to the other regions and countries to construct the gridded inventory with error characterization. Use of our inventory as prior information in future inverse analyses can help better quantify spatial distributions and sources of CFC-11 emissions as well as better guide the regulation of CFC-11.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→