Incremental-Oil Success From Waterflood Sweep Improvement in Alaska
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Waterflood thief zones in communication with the rest of the reservoir are a severe and previously challenging problem. This paper gives an introduction to the nature of a novel, heat-activated polymer particulate. Details are presented of a trial of this in-depth diversion system, resulting in commercially significant incremental oil from a BP Alaskan field. The system of one injector and two producers was selected because of a high water/oil ratio and low recovery factor, which was recognized as an indicator of the presence of an injection-water thief zone and was confirmed by study of a previous injection survey. The area around the wells is bounded by faults, so the system can be considered to be isolated from surrounding wells and operations. The position of the thermal front in the reservoir, tracer transit times, injection rates, and interwell separations indicated that the slowest reacting of the three commercial grades available was most appropriate for the trial. The treatment was designed using laboratory tests and numerical simulation informed by pressure and chemical-tracer tests. Long- sandpack tests indicated permeability-reduction factors of 11 to 350 for concentrations of 1,500 to 3,500 ppm active particles in sand of 560- to 670-md permeability at 149°F. 15,587 gal of particulate product was dispersed using 8,060 gallons of dispersing surfactant, into 38,000 bbl of injected water, and was pumped over a period of 3 weeks at a concentration of 3,300 ppm active particles. Placement deep in the reservoir between injector and producer was confirmed by pressure-falloff analysis and injectivity tests. The incremental oil predicted from the simulation was 50,000 to 250,000 bbl over 10 years. In fact, more than 60,000 bbl of oil was recovered in the first 4 years at a cost comparable with that of traditional well work and less than that of sidetracking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it