MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3155799532 · doi:10.53967/cje-rce.v44i1.3573

Compétences professionnelles et transfert des apprentissages des directions d’établissement en formation universitaire : une exploration franco-manitobaine

2021· article· fr· W3155799532 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Hélène Archambault, Gabriel Dumouchel

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à ChicoutimiUniversité de Saint-Boniface
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette recherche a pour objectifs d’identifier les compétences professionnelles développées par des étudiants ayant suivi le programme de maîtrise en éducation avec spécialisation en administration scolaire de l’Université de Saint-Boniface et de distinguer les conditions facilitantes et inhibantes au transfert des apprentissages. Pour ce faire, cette recherche utilise une méthodologie qualitative centrée sur le journal de bord et l’entrevue individuelle semi-dirigée. Les résultats indiquent qu’un ensemble de compétences professionnelles développées par les directions d’établissement scolaire en cours de formation favoriseraient une transformation de leurs pratiques quotidiennes. La discussion souligne différentes conditions facilitant le transfert des apprentissages afin de mieux comprendre cette transformation des pratiques. Mots-clés : formation en administration scolaire, compétences professionnelles, transfert d’apprentissage, direction d’école, réussite scolaire des élèves

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207