A tutorial in photoacoustic microscopy and tomography signal processing methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the last two and a half decades, photoacoustic (PA) imaging has become an important area of research in biomedical optics. Combining the high contrast of optical imaging with the high spatial resolution of ultrasound (US) imaging, PA imaging can simultaneously visualize anatomical structures while interrogating their functionality through multiwavelength optical spectroscopy. Alongside technological developments and imaging applications in optical and acoustic resolution PA imaging, a family of PA signal analysis techniques can extract additional information about the sample being imaged. This Tutorial focuses on techniques that rely on the analysis of PA signals in a manner similar to that in the complimentary field of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging of soft tissues. In QUS, signal analysis techniques have been developed to analyze the US signals resulting from the scattering of many unresolved scatterers within the resolution volume of the imaging device. The implementation of these US techniques in PA can enable new applications in biomedicine beyond traditional anatomical PA imaging, further increasing the utilization and impact of this promising modality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".