MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3155830206 · doi:10.7202/1073759ar

Les médicaments dans le suicide

2020· article· fr· W3155830206 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michel Pozo, Brian L. Mishara, Anne Second-Pozo

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’utilisation des médicaments, et notamment des psychotropes, dans la vie courante a entraîné des changements importants dans la problématique du suicide : pour la première fois, un moyen thérapeutique est utilisé pour se donner la mort et la proportion de tentatives non létales pour chaque décès par suicide a augmenté énormément. Les médicaments constituent le troisième mode de suicide au Canada comme en France, et ils sont impliqués dans plus de 80 % des hospitalisations pour tentatives de suicide dans ces deux pays. Les liens entre médicaments et suicide sont complexes. Une des façons de comprendre le choix d’un médicament comme moyen de suicide est l’association entre les effets escomptés d’un décès par suicide et les effets escomptés de l’utilisation des médicaments qui ont pour objectif de s’en prendre à la tête, contenu de la psyché, et d’attaquer les pensées, les tensions, la souffrance en les endormant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontièresSame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207