Identification of Key Genes and Pathways in Osteoarthritis via Bioinformatic Tools: An Updated Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a severe and common degenerative disease; however, the exact pathology of OA is undefined. Our study is designed to investigate the underlying molecular mechanism of OA with bioinformatic tools. DESIGN: Three updated GEO datasets: GSE55235, GSE55457, and GSE82107 were selected for data analyzing. R software was utilized to screen and confirm the candidate differentially expressed genes in the development of OA. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway were performed to identify the enriched GO terms and signaling pathways. Protein and protein interaction (PPI) models were built to observe the connected relationship among each potential protein. RESULTS: A total of 113 upregulated genes and 161 downregulated genes were found by integrating 3 datasets. GO enrichment indicated that cell differentiation, cellular response to starvation, and negative regulation of phosphorylation were important biological processes. KEGG enrichment indicated that FoxO, IL-17 signaling pathways, and osteoclast differentiation mainly participated in the progression of OA. Combining the molecular function and PPI results, ubiquitylation was identified as a pivotal bioactive reaction involved in OA. CONCLUSION: Our study provided updated candidate genes and pathways of OA, which may benefit further research and treatment for OA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".