High Latitude Climatology of the Phase and Amplitude Fluctuations in GPS Signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electromagnetic waves propagating through the Earth’s ionosphere are subjected to changes in group and phase velocities, refraction, dispersion, and diffraction. For systems like GPS, which relies on the usage of L-band signals, rapid and random fluctuations in the phase and amplitude (known as scintillation) of the signals passing through the ionosphere play a major role, as they may cause losses of lock and result in degrading the accuracy and reliability of such systems. Therefore, understanding the physical nature and ability to predict the scintillation has been a challenge since a long time for engineers and scientists. In this work, a climatological model of rapid random fluctuations in phase and amplitude of GPS signals has been presented for high latitudes of the northern hemisphere. The 50Hz GPS raw data from Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network (CHAIN) for the 24th solar cycle (2008-2019) have been used to study the climatology of the rapid fluctuations in phase and amplitude of the GPS signals. The statistical analysis has been performed in terms of phase and amplitude scintillation indices (𝜎𝜑 and 𝑆4). The results are presented for different geo- and helio-physical conditions, including solar and geomagnetic activity, season, local time and geographical/geomagnetic location of ionospheric pierce points. For the first time, the distribution of the signal phase and amplitude fluctuations are presented for the whole period of the 24th solar cycle. An important quantitative statistical relation of the phase and amplitude fluctuations in GPS signals have been established for the high latitude region. A theoretical explanation is suggested for the observed differences in phase and amplitude fluctuations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".