Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two hitherto unknown paintings by Valdés Leal (1622-1690), both in Spanish private collections, are published and discussed. A Saint Ferdinand Conqueror of Jaén, of 1673-75 (Fig. 3), is a preparatory oil-sketch for the large canvas in the cathedral of Jaén (Fig. 1). It represents the Spanish king Ferdinand III (1198-1252), hero of the ‘reconquista,’ whose canonization in 1671 was celebrated in the Seville cathedral by a series of ceremonies and feasts. Valdés Leal was deeply involved with these ceremonies, together with his friend the sculplor Pedro Roldán (1624-1700), generally credited with the creation of the typology of the new saint. A drawing by Valdés Leal in the Kunsthalle, Hamburg (Fig. 2), is certainly related to the Jaén commission as well. The second previously unpublished painting, a Saint Ferdinand (Fig. 4), is here identified as the one in possession of Leon y Ledesma, Canon of the Sevillian cathedral, a contemporary of Valdés Leal. The painting was mentioned in the inventory of León y Ledesma’s belongings (Gestoso, 1916).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".