Managing a firm in the face of change
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the publication is to study the management of the company in the context of economic changes associated with the introduction of innovations in its activities, their combinations, and taking into account the initiated entrepreneurs proper vision. In accordance with the goal, the following tasks are formulated: to achieve the company management potential, aimed at solving intra-company issues and at the same time transforming the entire market system; to identify duality of market regularity of its manifestation in modern economic environment and to propose a number of directions of its improvement on the basis of synergy of combined progressive trends introduced into production. The research methodology is based on the fundamental difference between the division of labor inside of the company and similar structures and the social division of labor itself; a well-known postulate on the commonality and features of the homotypic economic phenomena, which are the market economy and its main link – a company, organization, enterprise, etc. in the article. The results include a generalization of scientists’ views on the management of the company in conditions of change in labor, production and the economy, which occurs due to the introduction of innovations, their various combinations, into the entrepreneurial process. The company’s connection is disclosed not only with the market (exchange sphere), but also with the market economy as a cohesive whole. It is justified that both structures become the engine of economic growth. The company management itself is represented not only inside of it, but also outside, as the continuation and generation of a functioning market, market system. This is the key aspect of economic development. In conclusion, it is concluded that the management of an entrepreneurial company under conditions of change becomes the basic tool for the progress of business entities, turns into a specific rational channel for introducing combined modernization of the economy, and the search for ways to resolve the contradiction between them as part and whole, becomes the driving force of social progress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".