3D Flexible Refinement: Structure and Motion of Flexible Proteins from Cryo-EM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Single particle cryo-EM excels in determining static structures of biological macromolecules such as proteins. However, many proteins are dynamic, with their motion inherently linked to their function. Recovering the continuous motion and detailed 3D structure of flexible proteins from cryo-EM data has remained an open challenge. We introduce 3D Flexible Refinement (3DFlex), a motion-based deep neural network model of continuous heterogeneity. 3DFlex directly exploits the knowledge that conformational variability of a protein is often the result of physical processes that transport density over space and tend to conserve mass and preserve local geometry. From 2D image data, the 3DFlex model jointly learns a single canonical 3D map, latent coordinate vectors that specify positions on the protein’s conformational landscape, and a flow generator that, given a latent position as input, outputs a 3D deformation field. This deformation field convects the canonical map into appropriate conformations to explain experimental images. Applied to experimental data, 3DFlex learns non-rigid motion spanning several orders of magnitude while preserving high-resolution details of secondary structure elements. Further, 3DFlex resolves canonical maps that are improved relative to conventional refinement methods because particle images contribute to the maps coherently regardless of the conformation of the protein in the image. Together, the ability to obtain insight into motion in macromolecules, as well as the ability to resolve features that are usually lost in cryo-EM of flexible specimens, will provide new insight and allow new avenues of investigation into biomolecular structure and function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".